↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Teaching methods used by internal medicine residents on rounds: what works?

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Medical Education and Practice, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Teaching methods used by internal medicine residents on rounds: what works?
Published in
Advances in Medical Education and Practice, January 2019
DOI 10.2147/amep.s181153
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vivek T Kulkarni, Sanjay M Salgado, Stephen R Pelletier, Helen M Shields

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 25%
Professor 2 13%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 38%
Psychology 2 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Chemical Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,562,823
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,106
of 449,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Medical Education and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them