| Title |
A qualitative study on the design and development of an mHealth app to facilitate communication with the Deaf community: perspective of community pharmacists
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s182516 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Yie-Chuen Chong, Uma Devi Palanisamy, Sabrina Anne Jacob |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 73 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 14% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 11% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2019.
All research outputs
#5,407,995
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#394
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,748
of 446,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#9
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,429 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.