↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Timing is everything: an audit of process and outcomes from a pilot advanced scope physiotherapy model of care for women with pelvic floor conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Audit, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Timing is everything: an audit of process and outcomes from a pilot advanced scope physiotherapy model of care for women with pelvic floor conditions
Published in
Clinical Audit, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/ca.s180805
Authors

Kate Goode, Tara Beaumont, Saravana Kumar

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 9%
Researcher 1 9%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 2 18%
Psychology 2 18%
Computer Science 1 9%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2019.
All research outputs
#16,096,313
of 23,878,717 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Audit
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,846
of 442,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Audit
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,717 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them