↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

The combination of high bacterial count and positive biofilm formation is associated with the inflammation of pressure ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
Title
The combination of high bacterial count and positive biofilm formation is associated with the inflammation of pressure ulcers
Published in
Chronic Wound Care Management and Research, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/cwcmr.s187733
Authors

Mao Kunimitsu, Gojiro Nakagami, Aya Kitamura, Yuko Mugita, Kaname Akamata, Sanae Sasaki, Chieko Hayashi, Yukie Mori, Hiromi Sanada

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 11%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 5 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Chemistry 2 6%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,983,507
of 23,128,387 outputs
Outputs from Chronic Wound Care Management and Research
#15
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,236
of 438,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chronic Wound Care Management and Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,128,387 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them