| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of oral versus intravenous drip infusion of levofloxacin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infection in Chinese elderly patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Interventions in Aging, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.2147/cia.s127009 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Libin Zhang, Ping Hu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 27% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 18% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 18% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2019.
All research outputs
#8,537,346
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#818
of 1,968 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,602
of 323,961 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Interventions in Aging
#24
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,968 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,961 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.