↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Drug-loaded erythrocytes: on the road toward marketing approval

Overview of attention for article published in Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
Drug-loaded erythrocytes: on the road toward marketing approval
Published in
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/dddt.s96470
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanessa Bourgeaux, José M Lanao, Bridget E Bax, Yann Godfrin

Abstract

Erythrocyte drug encapsulation is one of the most promising therapeutic alternative approaches for the administration of toxic or rapidly cleared drugs. Drug-loaded erythrocytes can operate through one of the three main mechanisms of action: extension of circulation half-life (bioreactor), slow drug release, or specific organ targeting. Although the clinical development of erythrocyte carriers is confronted with regulatory and development process challenges, industrial development is expanding. The manufacture of this type of product can be either centralized or bedside based, and different procedures are employed for the encapsulation of therapeutic agents. The major challenges for successful industrialization include production scalability, process validation, and quality control of the released therapeutic agents. Advantages and drawbacks of the different manufacturing processes as well as success key points of clinical development are discussed. Several entrapment technologies based on osmotic methods have been industrialized. Companies have already achieved many of the critical clinical stages, thus providing the opportunity in the future to cover a wide range of diseases for which effective therapies are not currently available.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 118 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 14%
Student > Master 14 12%
Researcher 12 10%
Professor 7 6%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 25 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 25 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 15%
Engineering 13 11%
Chemistry 11 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Other 17 14%
Unknown 26 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2023.
All research outputs
#5,359,857
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#358
of 2,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,216
of 408,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#14
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 408,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.