| Title |
Health indicator recording in UK primary care electronic health records: key implications for handling missing data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Epidemiology, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/clep.s191437 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Irene Petersen, Catherine A Welch, Irwin Nazareth, Kate Walters, Louise Marston, Richard W Morris, James R Carpenter, Tim P Morris, Tra My Pham |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 13 | 57% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 52% |
| Scientists | 9 | 39% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 77 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 19% |
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,714,974
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Epidemiology
#77
of 806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,088
of 450,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Epidemiology
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them