↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Recurrent corneal erosion: a comprehensive review

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
Title
<p>Recurrent corneal erosion: a comprehensive review</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, February 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s157430
Pubmed ID
Authors

Darby D. Miller, Syed A. Hasan, Nathaniel Simmons, Michael W. Stewart

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 62 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 16%
Other 9 15%
Researcher 7 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 10%
Professor 4 6%
Other 11 18%
Unknown 15 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Unspecified 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 16 26%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#9,381,015
of 17,060,012 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#661
of 2,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#156,314
of 348,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,060,012 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,439 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them