↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Considerations in biosimilar insulin device development

Overview of attention for article published in Biosimilars, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Considerations in biosimilar insulin device development
Published in
Biosimilars, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/bs.s77034
Authors

Andrew Krentz, Marcus Hompesch, Andrew Fry

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 30%
Student > Master 2 20%
Professor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Lecturer 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Unknown 1 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 40%
Engineering 2 20%
Chemistry 1 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 10%
Unknown 2 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2016.
All research outputs
#16,862,842
of 25,576,275 outputs
Outputs from Biosimilars
#13
of 29 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,471
of 407,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biosimilars
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 29 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.8. This one scored the same or higher as 16 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.