| Title |
Impact of dry eye on work productivity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, October 2012
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ceor.s36352 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Masakazu Yamada, Yoshinobu Mizuno, Chika Shigeyasu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 110 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 27 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 43% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,226,013
of 25,457,297 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#32
of 525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,325
of 191,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,297 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,152 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them