↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Diagnosis, assessment, and phenotyping of COPD: beyond FEV1

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
187 Mendeley
Title
Diagnosis, assessment, and phenotyping of COPD: beyond FEV1
Published in
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/copd.s85976
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Finch, Peter Lange, David Halpin, Denis O’Donnell, William MacNee

Abstract

COPD is now widely recognized as a complex heterogeneous syndrome, having both pulmonary and extrapulmonary features. In clinical practice, the diagnosis of COPD is based on the presence of chronic airflow limitation, as assessed by post-bronchodilator spirometry. The severity of the airflow limitation, as measured by percent predicted FEV1, provides important information to the physician to enable optimization of management. However, in order to accurately assess the complexity of COPD, there need to be other measures made beyond FEV1. At present, there is a lack of reliable and simple blood biomarkers to confirm and further assess the diagnosis of COPD. However, it is possible to identify patients who display different phenotypic characteristics of COPD that relate to clinically relevant outcomes. Currently, validated phenotypes of COPD include alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, and "frequent exacerbators". Recently, a definition and assessment of a new phenotype comprising patients with overlapping features of asthma and COPD has been suggested and is known as "asthma COPD overlap syndrome". Several other phenotypes have been proposed, but require validation against clinical outcomes. Defining phenotypes requires the assessment of multiple factors indicating disease severity, its impact, and its activity. Recognition and validation of COPD phenotypes has an important role to play in the selection of evidence-based targeted therapy in the future management of COPD, but regardless of the diagnostic terms, patients with COPD should be assessed and treated according to their individual treatable characteristics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 186 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 12%
Student > Master 21 11%
Other 20 11%
Researcher 14 7%
Other 36 19%
Unknown 42 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 66 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 52 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,301,033
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#517
of 2,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,991
of 406,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#17
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 406,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.