↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo®) and Humphrey Field Analyzer

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 tweeters
video
1 video uploader

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
<p>Comparison of head-mounted perimeter (imo<sup>&reg;</sup>) and Humphrey Field Analyzer</p>
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2019
DOI 10.2147/opth.s190995
Authors

Tairo Kimura, Chota Matsumoto, Hiroki Nomoto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 21%
Researcher 3 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 11%
Other 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Other 4 21%
Unknown 2 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Physics and Astronomy 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Other 5 26%
Unknown 3 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2019.
All research outputs
#10,214,772
of 18,829,177 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#611
of 2,260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,758
of 277,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,829,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,920 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them