Title |
Improved virtual surgical planning with 3D-multimodality image for malignant giant pelvic tumors
|
---|---|
Published in |
Cancer Management and Research, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.2147/cmar.s185737 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiang Fang, Zeping Yu, Yan Xiong, Fang Yuan, Hongyuan Liu, Fan Wu, Wenli Zhang, Yi Luo, Liuhong Song, Chongqi Tu, Hong Duan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 28% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Neuroscience | 1 | 6% |
Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2018.
All research outputs
#20,559,323
of 23,133,982 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,405
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#372,569
of 437,320 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#80
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,133,982 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,320 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.