| Title |
Quantification of nutritive sucking among preterm and full-term infants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research and Reports in Neonatology, October 2018
|
| DOI | 10.2147/rrn.s165421 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ashley Scherman, Jack Wiedrick, William Lang, Rebecca Rdesinski, Jodi Lapidus, Cynthia McEvoy, Aimee Abu-Shamsieh, Scott Buckley, Brian Rogers, Neil Buist |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 10% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2018.
All research outputs
#23,100,963
of 25,748,735 outputs
Outputs from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,587
of 355,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research and Reports in Neonatology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,748,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them