| Title |
Recent national trends in Salvia divinorum use and substance-use disorders among recent and former Salvia divinorum users compared with nonusers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, April 2011
|
| DOI | 10.2147/sar.s17192 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Li-Tzy Wu, George E Woody, Chongming Yang, Jih-Heng Li, Dan G Blazer |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 17% |
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 9 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 27% |
| Psychology | 6 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 10% |
| Philosophy | 2 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 17% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#8,713,411
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#76
of 125 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,457
of 121,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance abuse and rehabilitation
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.