↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Selective adherence to antihypertensive medications as a patient-driven means to preserving sexual potency

Overview of attention for article published in Patient preference and adherence, August 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
Title
Selective adherence to antihypertensive medications as a patient-driven means to preserving sexual potency
Published in
Patient preference and adherence, August 2008
DOI 10.2147/ppa.s3796
Pubmed ID
Authors

Corrine I Voils, Margarete Sandelowski, Philipp Dahm, Rachel Blouin, Hayden B Bosworth, Eugene Z Oddone, Karen E Steinhauser

Abstract

To describe hypertensive patients' experiences with sexual side effects and their consequences for antihypertensive medication adherence. Data were from a study conducted to identify facilitators of and barriers to adherence to blood pressure-lowering regimens. Participants were 38 married and unmarried veterans with a diagnosis of hypertension and 13 female spouses. Eight patient and four spouse focus groups were conducted. A directed approach to content analysis was used to determine the facilitators of and barriers to adherence. For this report, all discussion concerning the topic of sexual relations was extracted. Male patients viewed sexual intercourse as a high priority and felt that a lack of sexual intercourse was unnatural. They pursued strategies to preserve their potency, including discontinuing or selectively adhering to their medications and obtaining treatments for impotence. In contrast, spouses felt that sexual intercourse was a low priority and that a lack of sexual intercourse was natural. They discouraged their husbands from seeking treatments for impotence. Although the primary study was not designed to explore issues of sexual function, the issue emerged spontaneously in the majority of discussions, indicating that sexuality is important in this context for both male patients and their spouses. Physicians should address sexual side effects of antihypertensive medications with patients, ideally involving spouses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 5%
New Zealand 1 5%
Unknown 17 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 26%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 16%
Student > Master 2 11%
Student > Postgraduate 2 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 11%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 11%
Psychology 2 11%
Social Sciences 2 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2022.
All research outputs
#20,657,128
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,431
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,621
of 97,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.