| Title |
Translational challenges of animal models in Chagas disease drug development: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Design, Development and Therapy, August 2015
|
| DOI | 10.2147/dddt.s90208 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Eric Chatelain, Nandini Konar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 169 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 34 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 11% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 17 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 14 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 18% |
| Unknown | 42 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2019.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#642
of 2,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,634
of 276,419 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Design, Development and Therapy
#41
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,419 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.