| Title |
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to improve medication adherence in people with depressive disorders - MAPDep: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, February 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s172963 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tasmania del Pino-Sedeño, Wenceslao Peñate, Carlos de las Cuevas, Cristina Valcarcel-Nazco, Ascensión Fumero, Pedro Guillermo Serrano-Pérez, Francisco Javier Acosta Artiles, Vanesa Ramos García, Beatriz León Salas, Daniel Bejarano-Quisoboni, María M Trujillo-Martín |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 126 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 126 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 17% |
| Psychology | 19 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 19% |
| Unknown | 44 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2019.
All research outputs
#17,295,853
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#1,065
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,712
of 447,265 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#13
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,265 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.