| Title |
The role of PHD2 mutations in the pathogenesis of erythrocytosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Hypoxia, July 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/hp.s54455 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Betty Gardie, Melanie J Percy, David Hoogewijs, Rasheduzzaman Chowdhury, Celeste Bento, Patrick R Arsenault, Stéphane Richard, Helena Almeida, Joanne Ewing, Frédéric Lambert, Mary Frances McMullin, Christopher J Schofield, Frank S Lee |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 32 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 38% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2014.
All research outputs
#20,563,454
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Hypoxia
#43
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,972
of 228,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hypoxia
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one scored the same or higher as 6 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.