↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Perioperative C-reactive protein is associated with pain outcomes after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Perioperative C-reactive protein is associated with pain outcomes after major laparoscopic abdominal surgery: a retrospective analysis
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, March 2019
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s187249
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hey-Ran Choi, In-Ae Song, Tak Kyu Oh, Young-Tae Jeon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 22%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Other 1 4%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 39%
Psychology 1 4%
Unknown 13 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2019.
All research outputs
#15,567,535
of 23,138,859 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#1,173
of 1,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#221,911
of 354,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#37
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,138,859 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.