| Title |
Biochronomer™ technology and the development of APF530, a sustained release formulation of granisetron
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of experimental pharmacology, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jep.s68880 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Ottoboni, Mark S Gelder, Erin O’Boyle |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 50 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 17 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 19 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,415,054
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#16
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,861
of 369,122 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of experimental pharmacology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,122 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them