↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Review of mifamurtide in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
Title
Review of mifamurtide in the treatment of patients with osteosarcoma
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, June 2010
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s5688
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leo Kager, Pötschger, Bielack

Abstract

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant tumor of bone. The disease, however, is very rare with less than 2,000 expected patients at all age groups per year within the European Union and the United States of America. With multimodal therapy, which combines multiagent chemotherapy and complete resection of all macroscopically detectable tumors, about 60%-70% of patients with localized osteosarcoma can be cured. The prognosis, however, is still poor for patients with synchronous or metachronous metastatic or nonresectable primary disease, with reported 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rates of less than 30%. Overall, the EFS rate has been rather stable since the introduction of combination chemotherapy including doxorubicin, cisplatin, high-dose methotrexate with leukovorin rescue, and/or ifosfamide. Mifamurtide, a modulator of innate immunity, which activates macrophages and monocytes, which in turn release chemicals with potential tumoricidal effects, may help to control microscopic metastatic disease and has been safely given together with standard adjuvant chemotherapy to patients with high-grade osteosarcoma. Results of the recently published intergroup study 0133 trial from the Children's Cancer and Pediatric Oncology Groups suggest that mifamurtide is a medicine that deserves further investigation in this orphan disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Unknown 95 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 22%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Other 7 7%
Other 19 20%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Chemistry 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 19 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,563,572
of 23,248,929 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#344
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,163
of 97,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,248,929 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 97,094 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.