The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 196 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
| Title |
Fc gamma receptors: glycobiology and therapeutic prospects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inflammation Research, November 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jir.s121233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jerrard M Hayes, Mark R Wormald, Pauline M Rudd, Gavin P Davey |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 23% |
| Researcher | 30 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 13% |
| Unknown | 45 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 50 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 16% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 27 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 10% |
| Unknown | 49 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2023.
All research outputs
#7,666,915
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inflammation Research
#172
of 830 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,744
of 313,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inflammation Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 830 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.