| Title |
IJV collapsibility index vs IVC collapsibility index by point of care ultrasound for estimation of CVP: a comparative study with direct estimation of CVP
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oaem.s176175 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Haitham Mohammed Jassim, Vamanjore A Naushad, Mohamad Yahya Khatib, Prem Chandra, Mohammed Milad Abuhmaira, Sunil Hassan Koya, Mostafa Sayed Ahmed Ellitthy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malaysia | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Turkey | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Italy | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 47% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 26 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,821,110
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#33
of 231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,398
of 365,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.