↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: ongoing clinical challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pain Research, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
Title
Idiopathic intracranial hypertension: ongoing clinical challenges and future prospects
Published in
Journal of Pain Research, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/jpr.s60633
Pubmed ID
Authors

Parunyou Julayanont, Amputch Karukote, Doungporn Ruthirago, Deepa Panikkath, Ragesh Panikkath

Abstract

Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is an uncommon disorder characterized by increased intracranial pressure without radiological or laboratory evidence of intracranial pathology except empty sella turcica, optic nerve sheath with filled out cerebrospinal fluid spaces, and smooth-walled nonflow-related venous sinus stenosis or collapse. This condition typically affects obese women. The incidence of IIH is increasing with the rising prevalence of obesity. Persistent headache is the most common symptom. Visual impairment is a serious complication that may not be recognized by the patients. This paper reviews clinical manifestations, diagnostic challenges, and current treatments of IIH in adults. Various imaging modalities have been studied on their validity for detection of IIH and papilledema. This review also includes new studies on medical, surgical, and interventional management of this condition. Acetazolamide and topiramate are the only two medications that have been studied in randomized controlled trials about their efficacy in treatment of IIH. In patients who have severe visual impairment or progressive visual deterioration despite medical management, surgical or interventional treatment may be considered. The efficacy and complications of cerebrospinal fluid diversion, optic nerve sheath fenestration, and endovascular venous stenting reported in the last 3 decades have been summarized in this review. Finally, the prospective aspects of biomarkers and treatments are proposed for future research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 93 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 12%
Researcher 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 20 21%
Unknown 24 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 41%
Neuroscience 9 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 28 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2023.
All research outputs
#5,740,462
of 23,773,220 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pain Research
#551
of 1,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,614
of 401,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pain Research
#12
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,773,220 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,826 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.