↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
110 Mendeley
Title
Cognitive biases resulting from the representativeness heuristic in operations management: an experimental investigation
Published in
Psychology Research and Behavior Management, April 2019
DOI 10.2147/prbm.s193092
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mohammed AlKhars, Nicholas Evangelopoulos, Robert Pavur, Shailesh Kulkarni

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 110 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 15 14%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Lecturer 5 5%
Professor 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 53 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 16 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 6%
Psychology 6 5%
Engineering 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 59 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,525,372
of 24,187,394 outputs
Outputs from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#123
of 649 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,773
of 355,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology Research and Behavior Management
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,187,394 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 649 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,932 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.