↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Argatroban in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular Health and Risk Management, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Argatroban in the management of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia
Published in
Vascular Health and Risk Management, September 2010
DOI 10.2147/vhrm.s3904
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciano Babuin, Vittorio Pengo

Abstract

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immunoglobulin-mediated serious complication of heparin therapy characterized by thrombocytopenia and high risk for venous and arterial thrombosis: HIT and thrombosis syndrome (HITTS). Argatroban, a direct thrombin inhibitor, is indicated as the anticoagulant for the treatment and prophylaxis of thrombosis in patients with HIT and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who have HIT. The aim of this review is to examine the pharmacological characteristics and the clinical efficacy and safety of this drug in adults with HIT, including those undergoing PCI. Briefly, 2 prospective multicenter, nonrandomized, open-label studies evaluated the efficacy and safety of argatroban as an anticoagulant in patients with HIT or HITTS. Both studies showed that the incidence of the primary efficacy end point, a composite of all-cause death, all-cause amputation, or new thrombosis, was reduced in argatroban-treated patients vs control subjects with HIT or HITTS. In both studies, bleeding rates were similar between the groups. Argatroban was evaluated as the anticoagulant therapy in 3 prospective, multicenter, open-label studies in HIT patients who underwent PCI. The studies were similar in design with respect to patient inclusion and exclusion criteria, the argatroban dosing regimen, and primary efficacy outcomes. The investigators performed a pooled analysis of these studies, which showed that most (≥95%) patients achieved a satisfactory outcome from the procedure and adequate anticoagulation (coprimary end points).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Other 7 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 8 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2012.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#675
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,500
of 103,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular Health and Risk Management
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,821 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.