↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Hybrid graft vs autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
Title
Hybrid graft vs autograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis
Published in
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management, March 2019
DOI 10.2147/tcrm.s187979
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Wang, Jian-gang Cao, Jun Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 17%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 14 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2019.
All research outputs
#19,954,338
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#1,020
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,096
of 367,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,999 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.