| Title |
Engaging patients and informal caregivers to improve safety and facilitate person- and family-centered care during transitions from hospital to home – a qualitative descriptive study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Patient preference and adherence, April 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ppa.s201054 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chantal Backman, Danielle Cho-Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 30% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 15% |
| United States | 3 | 15% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 25% |
| Scientists | 4 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 23% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,481,170
of 25,850,376 outputs
Outputs from Patient preference and adherence
#202
of 1,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,331
of 365,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Patient preference and adherence
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,850,376 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.