↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Quality-of-life indicators and falls due to vitamin D deficiency

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Quality-of-life indicators and falls due to vitamin D deficiency
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s76360
Pubmed ID
Authors

Muhammad Raza Cheema, Ahmad Yar Chaudhry

Abstract

To determine whether the number of falls and quality-of-life indicators relate to serum levels of vitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and calcium levels. A prospective study. Patients being admitted with a fall with or without sustaining a fragility fracture post fall. Measured frequency of falling, SF-12 questionnaire, serum concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D, calcium, and PTH levels before and after treatment with vitamin D supplementation. The mean age (N=38) of the cohort was 80.2±12. In all, 76.3% of the cohort had sustained a fragility fracture after the fall. The cohort was vitamin D deficient with the pretreatment mean value of 24.2±17 nmol/L and posttreatment mean value of 99±40 nmol/L with a statistically significant mean difference of 74.7 nmol/L (confidence interval [CI] 61.27-88.3), P=0.001. The levels of calcium and PTH were statistically significant after treatment with a mean difference of 0.16 (CI 0.1-0.2), P=0.001, and 3.7 (CI -4.8 to -2.5), P=0.001, respectively. After treatment, the mean difference of physical component score (PCS) and mental component score for the whole cohort was 2.9 (CI -0.69 to 6.6), P=0.10, and 1.05 (CI -2.6 to 4.7), P=0.56, respectively. However, a subgroup analysis for cohort aged ≤70 years provided a statistically significant effect on PCS with a mean difference of 8.9 (CI 1.3-16.4), P=0.03, but a statistically insignificant improvement in mental component score with a mean difference of 6.0 (CI -17 to -5.0), P=0.20. However, a statistically significant improvement in PCS SF-12 was observed in patients ≤70 years of age 2.9 (1.3-16.4), P=0.03. The mean number of falls for the whole cohort pre- and posttreatment was 1.11±0.92 vs 0.97±0.99 (P=0.68), respectively. Patients who had fallen and sustained fragility fracture had lower serum 25-dihydroxyvitamin D and higher serum PTH levels. Our study demonstrates that there is no statistically significant improvement in the number of falls after treatment with vitamin D. Overall, vitamin D levels improved significantly, this is despite quality-of-life indicators showing a mean increase in PCS but not a statistically significant improvement. However, statistically significant improvement in PCS was observed in group aged ≤70 years after vitamin D supplementation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 15%
Lecturer 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Other 5 19%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2023.
All research outputs
#1,037,250
of 25,284,710 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#60
of 1,634 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,656
of 409,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,284,710 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,634 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.