↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Probiotics are effective at preventing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of General Medicine, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
25 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
155 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
235 Mendeley
Title
Probiotics are effective at preventing Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
International Journal of General Medicine, February 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijgm.s98280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christine SM Lau, Ronald S Chamberlain

Abstract

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. CDI has increased in incidence and severity over the past decade, and is a growing worldwide health problem associated with substantial health care costs and significant morbidity and mortality. This meta-analysis examines the impact of probiotics on the incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) among children and adults, in both hospital and outpatient settings. A comprehensive literature search of all published randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing the use of probiotics in the prevention of CDAD in patients receiving antibiotic therapy was conducted, and the incidence of CDAD was analyzed. Twenty-six RCTs involving 7,957 patients were analyzed. Probiotic use significantly reduced the risk of developing CDAD by 60.5% (relative risk [RR] =0.395; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.294-0.531; P<0.001). Probiotics proved beneficial in both adults and children (59.5% and 65.9% reduction), especially among hospitalized patients. Lactobacillus, Saccharomyces, and a mixture of probiotics were all beneficial in reducing the risk of developing CDAD (63.7%, 58.5%, and 58.2% reduction). Probiotic supplementation is associated with a significant reduction in the risk of developing CDAD in patients receiving antibiotics. Additional studies are required to determine the optimal dose and strain of probiotic.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 235 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 232 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 30 13%
Student > Bachelor 27 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 10%
Researcher 22 9%
Other 56 24%
Unknown 52 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 26 11%
Immunology and Microbiology 18 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 5%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 61 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,222,842
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of General Medicine
#68
of 1,669 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,582
of 412,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of General Medicine
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,669 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 412,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.