↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Adverse drug effects in hospitalized elderly: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Adverse drug effects in hospitalized elderly: Data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project
Published in
Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications, May 2010
DOI 10.2147/cpaa.s8779
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tatyana Shamliyan

Abstract

We aimed to analyze trends in hospital admissions due to adverse drug effects between the years 2000 to 2007 among the elderly using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. We identified the discharges with the principal and all listed diagnoses related to adverse drug effects and associated hospital charges using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) codes. Between 2000 and 2007, 321,057 patients over 65 years were discharged with a principal diagnosis related to an adverse drug effect. Hospital charges were $5,329,276,300 or $666,159,537 annual cost. The number of discharges and total hospital charges did not change over the examined years, while mean charge per discharge increased on average by $1064 ± 384 per year. Total hospital charges for drug-induced gastritis with hemorrhage increased the most by $11,206,555 per year among those 66-84 years old and by $8,646,456 per year among those older than 85 years. During 2007, 791,931 elderly had adverse treatment effects among all listed diagnoses with hospital charges of $937,795,690. Effective drug management interventions are needed to improve safety of treatments in the elderly.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
United States 1 4%
Ireland 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 24%
Other 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Master 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 7 28%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 56%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 16%
Unspecified 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2012.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#109
of 179 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,707
of 104,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Pharmacology : Advances and Applications
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 179 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.