| Title |
Systemic exposure to intracameral vs topical mydriatic agents: in cataract surgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Ophthalmology, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/opth.s189671 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jose Guell, Anders Behndig, Uwe Pleyer, Stéphane Jaulerry, Pascal Rozot, Pierre-Jean Pisella, Pierre-Yves Robert, Ines Lanzl, Sayeh Pourjavan, Carlos Aguiar, Joaquin Fernandez, Gunther Grabner, Rita Mencucci, Frédéric Chiambaretta, Marc Labetoulle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 17% |
| Unknown | 8 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 42% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2019.
All research outputs
#15,749,194
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#1,278
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,929
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#21
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.