↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Oral submucous fibrosis: an update

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
Title
Oral submucous fibrosis: an update
Published in
Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology, April 2015
DOI 10.2147/ccid.s80576
Pubmed ID
Authors

Uwe Wollina, Shyam B Verma, Fareedi Mukram Ali, Kishor Patil

Abstract

Oral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is a premalignant condition caused by betel chewing. It is very common in Southeast Asia but has started to spread to Europe and North America. OSF can lead to squamous cell carcinoma, a risk that is further increased by concomitant tobacco consumption. OSF is a diagnosis based on clinical symptoms and confirmation by histopathology. Hypovascularity leading to blanching of the oral mucosa, staining of teeth and gingiva, and trismus are major symptoms. Major constituents of betel quid are arecoline from betel nuts and copper, which are responsible for fibroblast dysfunction and fibrosis. A variety of extracellular and intracellular signaling pathways might be involved. Treatment of OSF is difficult, as not many large, randomized controlled trials have been conducted. The principal actions of drug therapy include antifibrotic, anti-inflammatory, and antioxygen radical mechanisms. Potential new drugs are on the horizon. Surgery may be necessary in advanced cases of trismus. Prevention is most important, as no healing can be achieved with available treatments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 40 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Master 18 10%
Researcher 12 7%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 39 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 58%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Engineering 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Other 13 7%
Unknown 42 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#16,721,208
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#526
of 905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,142
of 279,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,164 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.