| Title |
A cost-effectiveness evaluation of the originator follitropin alpha compared to the biosimilars for assisted reproduction in Germany
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s193048 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weiguang Xue, Adam Lloyd, Edel Falla, Claudia Roeder, Rudiger Papsch, Klaus Bühler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 28% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 11% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 4 | 22% |
| Unknown | 6 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2019.
All research outputs
#20,207,909
of 24,844,992 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#657
of 851 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#270,719
of 356,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#9
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,844,992 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 851 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.