↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Liquid crystal nanoparticle formulation as an oral drug delivery system for liver-specific distribution

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
69 Mendeley
Title
Liquid crystal nanoparticle formulation as an oral drug delivery system for liver-specific distribution
Published in
International Journal of Nanomedicine, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijn.s97000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dong Ryeol Lee, Ji Su Park, Il Hak Bae, Yan Lee, B Moon Kim

Abstract

Liquid crystal nanoparticles have been utilized as an efficient tool for drug delivery with enhanced bioavailability, drug stability, and targeted drug delivery. However, the high energy requirements and the high cost of the liquid crystal preparation have been obstacles to their widespread use in the pharmaceutical industry. In this study, we prepared liquid crystal nanoparticles using a phase-inversion temperature method, which is a uniquely low energy process. Particles prepared with the above method were estimated to be ~100 nm in size and exhibited a lamellar liquid crystal structure with orthorhombic lateral packing. Pharmacokinetic and tissue distribution studies of a hydrophobic peptide-based drug candidate formulated with the liquid crystal nanoparticles showed a five-fold enhancement of bioavailability, sustained release, and liver-specific drug delivery compared to a host-guest complex formulation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 68 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 12%
Researcher 6 9%
Other 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 20%
Chemistry 8 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 24 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,913,296
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#1,587
of 4,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,147
of 312,592 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#36
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,592 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.