| Title |
A critical exploration of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework from the perspective of oncology: recommendations for revision
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.2147/jmdh.s40020 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Catherine C Bornbaum, Philip C Doyle, Elizabeth Skarakis-Doyle, Julie A Theurer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 13 | 18% |
| Researcher | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 22% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 14% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 20 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2020.
All research outputs
#13,767,344
of 22,852,911 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#396
of 819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,232
of 194,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,852,911 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.