| Title |
Toxicologic effects of gold nanoparticles in vivo by different administration routes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Nanomedicine, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijn.s8428 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xiao-Dong Zhang, Hong-Ying Wu, Di Wu, Yue-Ying Wang, Jian-Hui Chang, Zhi-Bin Zhai, Ai-Min Meng, Pei-Xun Liu, Liang-An Zhang, Fei-Yue Fan |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 408 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 400 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 106 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 63 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 41 | 10% |
| Researcher | 38 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 5% |
| Other | 52 | 13% |
| Unknown | 86 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 65 | 16% |
| Chemistry | 60 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 42 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 30 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 88 | 22% |
| Unknown | 103 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,835,823
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#393
of 4,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,000
of 103,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
#5
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,123 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.