↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Management and Research, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Does the radiologist need to rescan the breast lesion to validate the final BI-RADS US assessment made on the static images in the diagnostic setting?
Published in
Cancer Management and Research, May 2019
DOI 10.2147/cmar.s198435
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yue Hu, Jingsi Mei, Xiaofang Jiang, Ran Gu, Fengtao Liu, Yaping Yang, Hongli Wang, Shiyu Shen, Haixia Jia, Qiang Liu, Chang Gong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Lecturer 1 13%
Student > Master 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 1 13%
Psychology 1 13%
Social Sciences 1 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#18,682,602
of 23,148,322 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Management and Research
#1,057
of 2,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#263,136
of 350,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Management and Research
#38
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,148,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,018 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.