↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Covariate random effects on the CD4 count variation during HIV disease progression in women

Overview of attention for article published in HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
Title
<p>Covariate random effects on the CD4 count variation during HIV disease progression in women</p>
Published in
HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.), May 2019
DOI 10.2147/hiv.s193652
Authors

Partson Tinarwo, Temesgen Zewotir, Delia North

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 50%
Other 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2019.
All research outputs
#12,395,264
of 14,009,177 outputs
Outputs from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#155
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,118
of 257,549 outputs
Outputs of similar age from HIV/AIDS (Auckland, N.Z.)
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,009,177 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,549 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them