| Title |
Nasal high flow: physiology, efficacy and safety in the acute care setting, a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Open access emergency medicine OAEM, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/oaem.s180197 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tommaso Mauri, Yu-Mei Wang, Francesca Dalla Corte, Nadia Corcione, Elena Spinelli, Antonio Pesenti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 4 | 21% |
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Poland | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 74% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 26% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 22 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 30 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2020.
All research outputs
#3,063,881
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#19
of 233 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,382
of 364,650 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Open access emergency medicine OAEM
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 233 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,650 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.