↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Article Metrics

Cold agglutinin disease: current challenges and future prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Blood Medicine, April 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
<p>Cold agglutinin disease: current challenges and future prospects</p>
Published in
Journal of Blood Medicine, April 2019
DOI 10.2147/jbm.s177621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sigbjørn Berentsen, Alexander Röth, Ulla Randen, Bernd Jilma, Geir E Tjønnfjord

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 23%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Other 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 62%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 31%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#13,326,088
of 15,094,232 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Blood Medicine
#120
of 149 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,954
of 264,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Blood Medicine
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,094,232 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 149 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them