Title |
Outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients with and without COPD
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2019
|
DOI | 10.2147/copd.s201866 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kuang-Ming Liao, Chien-Jen Tseng, Yi-Chen Chen, Jhi-Joung Wang, Chung-Han Ho |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 23% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 32% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 11 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,839,027
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#562
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,071
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#14
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.