| Title |
The etiologic origins for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/copd.s203215 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xinwei Huang, Xi Mu, Li Deng, Aili Fu, Endong Pu, Tao Tang, Xiangyang Kong |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 11% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 5% |
| Professor | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 76 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#2,404
of 2,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,599
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
#40
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.