<p>Activity-related dyspnea in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: physical and psychological consequences, unmet needs, and future directions</p>
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, May 2019
Nicola A Hanania, Denis E O'Donnell
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||25%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||1||25%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||1||25%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Bachelor||34||17%|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||18||9%|
|Student > Master||15||7%|
|Student > Postgraduate||8||4%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Nursing and Health Professions||42||21%|
|Medicine and Dentistry||23||11%|
|Sports and Recreations||5||2%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,149,216 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 2,369 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 350,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,149,216 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,369 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.