↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP) complications and side effects: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Nature and science of sleep, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP) complications and side effects: a systematic review
Published in
Nature and science of sleep, May 2019
DOI 10.2147/nss.s178540
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeffrey Wischhusen, Uneeb Qureshi, Macario Camacho

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 27%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Master 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 13 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Decision Sciences 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 14 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,767,715
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Nature and science of sleep
#560
of 629 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#315,599
of 363,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature and science of sleep
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 629 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,254 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.