| Title |
Burden of surgical site infection following cesarean section in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Women's Health, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.2147/ijwh.s182362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angie Sway, Peter Nthumba, Joseph Solomkin, Giorgio Tarchini, Ronald Gibbs, Yanhan Ren, Anthony Wanyoro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Kenya | 2 | 14% |
| United States | 2 | 14% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 202 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Researcher | 15 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Unknown | 95 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 6% |
| Unknown | 99 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,125,287
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#166
of 793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,570
of 350,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 793 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.