<p>Photothermal effects of NaYF<sub>4</sub>:Yb,Er@PE<sub>3</sub>@Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> superparamagnetic nanoprobes in the treatment of melanoma</p>
International Journal of Nanomedicine, June 2019
Xue Wang, Chunyang Kang, Ying Pan, Rihua Jiang
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||1||100%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Ph. D. Student||3||30%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology||2||20%|
|Nursing and Health Professions||1||10%|
|Physics and Astronomy||1||10%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2019.
All research outputs
of 23,150,406 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 3,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 349,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Nanomedicine
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,150,406 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.