↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Profile of bevacizumab in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: current perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Women's Health, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
Title
Profile of bevacizumab in the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: current perspectives
Published in
International Journal of Women's Health, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/ijwh.s78101
Pubmed ID
Authors

E Clair McClung, Robert M Wenham

Abstract

Patients with platinum-resistant ovarian cancer have progression of disease within 6 months of completing platinum-based chemotherapy. While several chemotherapeutic options exist for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer, the overall response to any of these therapies is ~10%, with a median progression-free survival of 3-4 months and a median overall survival of 9-12 months. Bevacizumab (Avastin), a humanized, monoclonal antivascular endothelial growth factor antibody, has demonstrated antitumor activity in the platinum-resistant setting and was recently approved by US Food and Drug Administration for combination therapy with weekly paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, or topotecan. This review summarizes key clinical trials investigating bevacizumab for recurrent, platinum-resistant ovarian cancer and provides an overview of efficacy, safety, and quality of life data relevant in this setting. While bevacizumab is currently the most studied and clinically available antiangiogenic therapy, we summarize recent studies highlighting novel alternatives, including vascular endothelial growth factor-trap, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and angiopoietin inhibitor trebananib, and discuss their application for the treatment of platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Ecuador 1 2%
Unknown 42 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 7 16%
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 13 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 11%
Chemistry 3 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 5%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 13 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#3,073,692
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Women's Health
#162
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,594
of 298,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Women's Health
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 298,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.