↓ Skip to main content

Dove Medical Press

Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
108 Mendeley
Title
Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment
Published in
Clinical Ophthalmology, March 2016
DOI 10.2147/opth.s98529
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamyar Vaziri, Stephen G Schwartz, Krishna S Kishor, Harry W Flynn

Abstract

Despite treatment advances, rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RD) can have poor visual outcomes even with prompt and appropriate therapy. Pars plana vitrectomy is a leading management modality for the treatment of RD. This procedure is generally accompanied by the use of internal tamponade. Various gases and silicone oils may yield beneficial outcomes. Heavy silicone oils have been approved in some European nations but are not available in the USA. Different tamponade agents have unique benefits and risks, and choice of the agent should be individualized according to the characteristics of the patient and RD, as well as perioperative and postoperative factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 107 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 16 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 9 8%
Researcher 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 20 19%
Unknown 36 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 54 50%
Chemistry 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 40 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,754,462
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Ophthalmology
#560
of 3,712 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,370
of 312,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Ophthalmology
#13
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,712 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.